Showing posts with label Strong Towns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Strong Towns. Show all posts

Thursday, July 21, 2016

From Strong Towns — Historic buildings
get newer, greener lease on life

The story of Peggy and Tom Brennan who recently renovated and opened two unique buildings in downtown Detroit: the Green Garage, a business incubator and coworking space, andEl Moore, a residential apartment building and urban lodge. Find out how these businesses got started and where they're headed now. Read more: Historic Buildings Get Newer, Greener Lease on Life — Strong Towns

Friday, April 8, 2016

From Strong Towns
Why mixed-income neighborhoods matter
Lifting kids out of poverty

There’s a hopeful new sign that how we build our cities, and specifically, how good a job we do of building mixed income neighborhoods that are open to everyone can play a key role in reducing poverty and promoting equity. New research shows that neighborhood effects—the impact of peers, the local environment, neighbors—contribute significantly to success later in life. Poor kids who grow up in more mixed income neighborhoods have better lifetime economic results. This signals that an important strategy for addressing poverty is building cities where mixed income neighborhoods are the norm, rather than the exception. And this strategy can be implemented in a number of ways—not just by relocating the poor to better neighborhoods, but by actively promoting greater income integration in the neighborhoods... Read more: Why mixed-income neighborhoods matter: Lifting kids out of poverty — Strong Towns

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Charles Marohn in
The American Conservative
Cities for People—or Cars?

One hot summer day I walked through an old, neglected neighborhood, the kind of place where feral cats stalk mice in the weeds near cracked foundations. I carried a tape measure and clipboard, for measuring the width of the sidewalks, the spacing between trees, the length from the back of the curb to the front of the houses. I was channeling my inner New Urbanist, my desire to practice a primitive form of urban archaeology. I was attempting to discover deeper truths about what makes a city successful. Read more: Cities for People—or Cars? | The American Conservative

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

From @StrongTowns @TheSchoolOfLife —
How to make an attractive city

More at: An attractive city — Strong Towns

Sunday, February 1, 2015

It's not a complete street unless it's completely safe. #slowthecars @StrongTowns

More at: It's not a complete street unless it's completely safe. #slowthecars @StrongTowns

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

"No New Roads"
— @clmarohn @StrongTowns

Monday, November 17, 2014

Charles Montgomery in Salon.com
Wal-Mart: An economic cancer on our cities

Most of us agree that development that provides employment and tax revenue is good for cities. Some even argue that the need for jobs outweighs aesthetic, lifestyle, or climate concerns—in fact, this argument comes up any time Walmart proposes a new megastore near a small town. But a clear-eyed look at the spatial economics of land, jobs, and tax regimes should cause anyone to reject the anything-and-anywhere-goes development model. To explain, let me offer the story of an obsessive number cruncher who found his own urban laboratory quite by chance. Read more: Wal-Mart: An economic cancer on our cities - Salon.com

Friday, September 5, 2014

A wealth-creating pattern of development @neil21 @StrongTowns

Sunday, June 15, 2014

This pattern of development is 1000 yrs of acquired culture knowledge...& we've just thrown it away @clmarohn

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

#Stroad most unproductive of transportation investments, not good candidate for retrofit @StrongTowns

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

From Strong Towns —Neighbourhoods First

Neighborhoods First. A low risk, high return strategy for building a strong town. Cities across the country are starting to realize that the “big project” approach takes up too much staff time, wastes too much political energy and distracts too much from the basic needs of existing neighborhoods. Risky, low returning projects too often become expensive boondoggles that haunt a community for decades. Public officials everywhere are desperately seeking an alternative. Take less risk and grow financially stronger all while directly serving the people already living and working in your city. That’s a Strong Towns approach. Read more and download the report at: Neighborhoods First - Strong Towns

Thursday, September 5, 2013

From Strong Towns Blog
Setting Priorities at the Dept of Transportation


CHARLES MAROHN

Last week I was asked to privately comment on a priority ranking system being developed by a state DOT. After providing a (not flattering) critique of the proposed ranking system, I then offered my thoughts on how I would develop one.

Since I'm quite confident my suggestions will generate little more than amusement for anyone beyond the individuals/organization that requested my thoughts, I've decided to share them here. I'm not trying to embarrass any specific DOT or endanger any relationship (I was asked to comment in private) and so I've replaced the name with XDOT. Go ahead and substitute whatever your local DOT is because my advice would be the same. Read more: Setting Priorities at the DOT - Strong Towns Blog - Strong Towns

Monday, September 2, 2013

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Strong Towns' Chuck Marohn on Streetfilms



Strong Towns' Chuck Marohn: Why Suburban Growth Is a Ponzi Scheme
from Streetfilms on VimeoStrong Towns on Streetfilms

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

From The Atlantic Cities
Quantifying the Cost of Sprawl

EMILY BADGER  Sprawl is expensive. It costs more money to pave a road and connect a sewer line to five families each living a block apart on wooded lots than to build public infrastructure for those same five families living in a condo. It costs more money (and takes more time and gas) to serve those families with garbage trucks, fire engines, and ambulances. And in return – aswe've previously written – those five sprawling single-family homes likely yield less in tax revenue per acre than the apartment building that could house our fictitious residents downtown. Read more: Quantifying the Cost of Sprawl - Emily Badger - The Atlantic Cities

Monday, April 22, 2013

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Email to Nanaimo Mayor and Council —
A Couple of Quick Thoughts and a Suggestion

Subject: Quick thoughts and a suggestion...
Date: 17 April, 2013 1:02:03 PM PDT
To: Mayor&Council@nanaimo.ca
Cc: "sasha.angus@investnanaimo.com Angus"

Mayor Ruttan and Nanaimo City Councillors,

A couple of quick thoughts re VICC GM Denise Tacon's presentation to the last Council meeting.

A HR pro would probably not recommend the approach, but full marks for nerve I guess. Facing her board of directors in a performance review where she is delivering very disappointing numbers, her approach was to deflect attention to externals such as the global economic climate and a handful of local noisy nay-sayers. It did appear to elicit some commiseration and sympathy from some Councillors so I guess it wasn't a bad tactic after all.

On a much more important note, I had the feeling that she was unable to answer, to some Councillors' satisfaction, questions about  projected revenues, multiplier ratios, and the volume and analysis of "millions of dollars injected into the local economy". These are very difficult to quantify but I'm sure you all agree it's important we have as clear and accurate a picture of them as possible.

Monday, April 8, 2013