Prof. Max Cameron, UBC Political Science, Director of the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions. interviewed at the June 6 Vancouver Urban Forum on the need to separate the legislative and judicial roles of municipal politicians at public hearings...
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Citizens as Customers and Clients
University
of Alberta's James
Lightbody interviewed at the June 6
"......City government is
[now] thought to be Wallmart and citizens are no longer classic
citizens but we are customers and clients, that everything should be
user-pay, fees for service and managed by City Hall.... We have
retrenched into the legacy of Reagan and Thatcher into a very
non citizen oriented form of local administration."
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Email to Mayor, Council, City GMs re
Port Place Development Permit
From:
Frank
Murphy
Date:
June
24, 2012
To:
mayor.council@nanaimo.ca
Cc:
GeneralManagers@nanaimo.ca
Subject:
Port
Place Development Permit
A
quick two cents worth re the Port Place Development Permit on
Monday's Council Meeting agenda. You'll be aware that the residential
component promised in the first application and that was the basis
for Council's enthusiastic approval of that permit has been
eliminated. It is now promised for some time in the future. Please
remember it is well within your authority to ask for a time out here.
I hope you will ask Staff and the proponent the following questions.
What
alternatives have been considered and what alternatives could be
brought to Council for consideration?
What
approaches have worked well elsewhere. (Vancouver's Oakridge
redevelopment come to mind and I would suggest you request a briefing
from Director of Planning Andrew Tucker on the successes in similar
circumstances of Toronto architect and planner Ken Greenberg (Walking
Home).
Have
downtown merchants and/or their organization the Downtown
Nanaimo Partnership been asked to advise Council on any concerns they
may of the impact of this redevelopment?
Also,
I hope you'll take the time before you make any decision to walk the
site. Approach it from any direction and get a sense of this
extraordinary property and the opportunity that exists to, of course,
assist the corporate property owner achieve their business goals but
at the same time accomplish other objectives: downtown
revitalization, economic development, neighbourhood improvement,
fully integrating the site back into a multi-use walkable street grid
connected to and mutually beneficial to our established downtown
core.
The
opportunity to redevelop a key inner city site like this comes around
once every what, twenty-five years. Please take your time.
Frank
Murphy
Thursday, June 21, 2012
From Platforma Urbana ―
Cities in Focus: Curitiba, Brazil
Video: Cities in Focus, Curitiba, Brazil | Plataforma Urbana. Narration and interviews are in Portuguese. Terrific pictures of the day to day working of Curitiba's famous, innovative Bus Rapid Transit. This from Taras Grescoe's Straphanger: Savings Our Cities and Ourselves From the Automobile: "The Transitway system in Ottawa, which has been running since 1983, is an influential early attempt at BRT..." Plans are in place to convert it to light rail.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
From SUNN: Vancouver Historic Quartiers BC Fee-simple Attached Housing Now Legal
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Email to Mayor, Council, City GMs re: Vancouver Urban Forum
Date: June 16, 2012 11:59:00 AM PDT
To: mayor.council@nanaimo.ca
Cc: GeneralManagers@nanaimo.ca
Subject: Vancouver Urban Forum
Mayor Ruttan, Nanaimo City Councillors and General Managers,
Last week I attended former Vancouver Mayor Sam Sullivan's Vancouver Urban Forum. It was as former Vancouver City Councillor Gordon Price said, a feast of ideas. Here's 3 that stood out for me.
1 Municipal government reform. The level of government not only closest to us but the one with the most immediate impact on our daily lives, municipal government should be more inclusive and representative. The forum was subtitled the "Fourth Wave of Urban Reform", the first 3 dating back to Confederation followed by reforms, one in response to the other, in the 1910s and 1960s.
UBC's Prof. Max Cameron, head of the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, made a point which gave me pause: the concept that dates back to Aristotle of the separation of the judicial and legislative powers of a governing body. He points out that elected municipal officials are asked to participate in the Public Hearing Process as both the people who wrote the law and those who adjudicate disputes or applications for variance. A fundamental time proven principle, the separation of these responsibilities at the municipal level might offer a good place in moving toward reform. Sullivan asks the question: "Can we design our democracy better by implementing the separation of powers?"
2 The (mostly) single occupant car vs public transit. Cities around the world are realizing, even from a constitutional equal rights of all citizens perspective, the correct hierarchy of mobility in the city is 1. the pedestrian, 2. the cyclist (and other folks on all manner of self-powered wheels), 3. transit and 4. cars and trucks. I think it's fair to say we're continuing to plan and develop Nanaimo in about exactly the reverse order. I found very interesting, in TransLink's presentation, the insight that one of their proactive contributions to successful transit is the promotion of well designed, more densely populated, walkable neighbourhoods, where both work and amenities are located close to home.
3 Economic development. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser (keynote presenter and author of The Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier) examines the American Sunbelt cities, where the greatest, sprawling growth of the last 50 years and the worst of the devastating damage of the 2008 economic crisis occurred. (As have many others, notably Richard Florida in his The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive Post-Crash Prosperity) These economies, booming prior to the real estate crash, were based on 2 elements: appealing climate and the self-generating construction and marketing of residential housing at very low levels of population density. Insufficient attention to more sustainable economic development along with the prohibitive costs of infrastructure made these economies vulnerable to an inevitable shock: if it wasn't the economic crisis it would have been the rising costs of fossil fuels or any of a number of other factors. In the end they were little more than a Ponzi scheme. Surely a warning a city like Nanaimo should heed.
A fascinating forum and as I'm sure you agree, from where you're looking at it, it's an exciting transitional time for cities large and small.
Frank Murphy
Thursday, June 14, 2012
From The Georgia Straight —
Density Debate Pits Sullivanism
Vs Ideas of Jane Jacobs
Vancouver ex-mayor Sam Sullivan was a devotee of Canada’s most famous urban theorist until he fell in love with high-rises...
By Daniel Wood, June 7, 2012
From where former Vancouver mayor Sam Sullivan sits on this blustery April day, the past and the future are equally visible. Across the mouth of False Creek from Kits Point rise the towers of the West End. They are the legacy of Sullivan’s Non-Partisan Association (NPA) and its 1960s developer-cum-mayor, Tom “Terrific” Campbell, who called hippies “scum” back then and those who opposed his plans to densify the West End, Kitsilano, and Kerrisdale “pinkos, commies, and hamburgers”.
His nickname was used sarcastically by people who couldn’t abide his fierce high-rise plans. But Sullivan tells me he has just come to a shocking discovery. Considering the fact that suburban sprawl is—with its spacious, energy-consuming homes and requisite commuting—a disaster for the planet, then, to Sullivan’s mind, Campbell was right. Stacking people was right. Towers are good. And all the New Urbanist, low-rise, Jane Jacobs–loving, fuzzy-wuzzy antidevelopment forces were wrong when they brought a halt to the city’s concrete and steel densification in the early 1970s.
From where former Vancouver mayor Sam Sullivan sits on this blustery April day, the past and the future are equally visible. Across the mouth of False Creek from Kits Point rise the towers of the West End. They are the legacy of Sullivan’s Non-Partisan Association (NPA) and its 1960s developer-cum-mayor, Tom “Terrific” Campbell, who called hippies “scum” back then and those who opposed his plans to densify the West End, Kitsilano, and Kerrisdale “pinkos, commies, and hamburgers”.
His nickname was used sarcastically by people who couldn’t abide his fierce high-rise plans. But Sullivan tells me he has just come to a shocking discovery. Considering the fact that suburban sprawl is—with its spacious, energy-consuming homes and requisite commuting—a disaster for the planet, then, to Sullivan’s mind, Campbell was right. Stacking people was right. Towers are good. And all the New Urbanist, low-rise, Jane Jacobs–loving, fuzzy-wuzzy antidevelopment forces were wrong when they brought a halt to the city’s concrete and steel densification in the early 1970s.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Canadian Photographer Edward Burtynsky's "Oil" Opens at the Nevada Museum of Art
More Information: http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=55560&b=Edward%20Burtynsky[/url]
From Michael Geller's Blog —
Housing Form and Design: My Contribution to the Mayor's Affordable Housing Task Force
Yesterday I joined Bruce Hayden and Patrick Condon at SFU's Noon Time Conversation Series to discuss whether there is a need for alternatives to the glass high-rise tower for Vancouver. All three of us suggested that while there is a place for towers (well, two out of three were more supportive of building towers, right Patrick?) we all agreed that there is both a place and need for alternatives, especially those that can produce more affordable housing. These include fourplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked townhouses, wood-frame apartments up to six storeys, and mid-rise buildings, both 'set on their own grounds', and with zero side yards. Read more: Michael Geller's Blog: Housing Form and Design: my contribution to the Mayor's Affordable Housing Task Force.
Here's the report:
Here's the report:
Monday, June 4, 2012
The Vancouver Urban Forum, Wed. June 6
The Vancouver Urban Forum will take
place on Wednesday, June 6 from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM at the Vancouver
Playhouse Theatre. About 300 delegates are expected including some
from cities across Canada as well as from Albania, Australia,
Bangladesh, Colombia, etc. Attendees will experience a daylong
program of short presentations that will inform, provoke and
entertain and will be connected to the theme "achieving urban
densification" and a coming "fourth wave of urban reform."
Prof. James Lightbody of the
University of Alberta will set the stage by describing the first
three waves of urban reform in Canada and why we might be on the
verge of a fourth wave.
California city planner Dan Zack
will give an abridged version of his "Delightful Density"
presentation that is wowing residents groups in that state.
Brent Toderian, Vancouver Director
of Planning from 2006 to 2012, will present on "Density Done
Well."
Prof. Edward Glaeser of Harvard will
recommend what Vancouver needs to do to achieve affordable housing
and how density relates to economic prosperity.
Saturday, June 2, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)